The new labour struggle: less work, same pay, and basic income for all
We’ve also moved into a different phase of automation, a “fourth industrial revolution
” where artificial intelligence and machine learning can do the work of accountants
The logical solution would be to enjoy such automation by working less (while the amount of stuff produced remains the same with machines’ help). Instead, those of us lucky enough to be formally employed still work nominally 40-hour weeks (in reality too often working far more
) while ever more people can’t find any steady
The fruits of soaring productivity growth and the wealth generated by automation are not being redistributed
via rising salaries or shorter working hours. Instead they are captured by a tiny global elite. The richest 1%
now has more wealth than the rest of the world put together. Yet there isn’t a mass organised struggle explicitly calling for a redistribution of wealth and work
As productivity grew and each worker could produce ever more output, we consumed more and more stuff so that full time, 40-hour-a-week employment could stay stable. Now we’ve reached our limits, with climate change, pollution, deforestation and extinction spiralling out of control. We can’t afford
to keep consuming ever more.
South Africa’s inequality isn’t just a matter of income or wealth. It’s also a matter of working hours – some people have too many, some none at all.
The simplest proposal to achieve this is the universal basic income guarantee
: the idea that everyone gets enough cash every month to cover essential living costs, no matter what. It’s a redistributory measure
. If you earn enough to not need it, you give it back
to the communal pot when paying your taxes.
If that aspect is taken into account, the proposal is surprisingly affordable
. It could also end poverty
, stem inequality
, enable work that isn’t valued by capitalist markets (such as care work
or the arts
), and empower workers to bargain for better conditions without the fear of starvation or homelessness.
What we need are shorter working hours and a universal basic income. In other words, a leisure movement – not a labour movement.
This proposal is also radical because it challenges the unopposed accumulation of wealth amongst a small elite. It will certainly be opposed by the very wealthy. But then, so were calls for a 40-hour work week.
Read the full article at the Conversation